From Sigmund Freud to Gay Rage in Two Easy Steps
“One wonders whether there is any terminus now to gay demands or any possibility of sober discussion of the various issues surrounding the gay-rights movement,” began an article in National Review. The year was 1986, and New York City had just enacted legislation protecting gays from discrimination. One year later, Larry Kramer formed ACT UP, the Aids Coalition To Unleash Power, which made national news by disrupting mass at St. Patrick’s Cathedral. “The message we send to the Catholic hierarchy is simple:” ACT UP said, “curb your dogmatic crusade against the truth: condoms and safer-sex information save lives.”
Two decades later, another generation of gay activists disrupted churches, particularly Mormon ones this time, after Californians passed Proposition 8 defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. “As long as they believe that there’s something wrong with us,” one protester warned, “it’s not going to end!”
This politics of temper tantrums and hissy fits springs in part from a theory Sigmund Freud articulated nearly a century ago. Freud observed people’s behavior and said that their one purpose in life was to be happy and that “sexual (genital) love is the prototype of all happiness.” In Civilization and Its Discontents, published in 1930, he argued that the primary source of mankind’s dissatisfaction, aggression, hostility, and ultimately violence was the conflict between individuals’ sexual needs and societal mores. In short, the problem for these protesters would be that some people frown on homosexuality.
But though Freud considered himself a scientist, most psychologists viewed Freud’s work as unscientific and poorly supported by research. His theories met with suspicion, and the fact that he was an atheist didn’t aid acceptance in “Christian” America. One exception though, a young New York pediatrician, effectively smuggled Freudianism into America’s childrearing zeitgeist.
America’s Freudian Permissivist
Dr. Benjamin Spock was trying desperately to reconcile Freudian concepts with what mothers told him about their babies, when he was approached by a publisher in search of a pediatrician knowledgeable about Freud. They had found their author, and Dr. Spock’s Baby and Child Care, published in 1946, sold 750,000 copies in the first year, and went on to sell over 50 million copies worldwide.
Much of his advice proved revolutionary in a positive way. He told parents to hug and kiss their children frequently, eschewing rigid schedules and stern discipline. But the kindly doctor shared Freud’s disdain for moralistic disapproval of – well, he just disapproved of moralistic disapproval. An agnostic adherent of no religion, and therefore of no objective standard for right and wrong, he counseled against arbitrary moralistic terms. “It’s not mentally healthy for people to be saddled with such a heavy conscience,” he wrote. Instead, Spock suggested parents reason with their children. “If your child has been involved in a fight, you first can sympathize with whatever feelings of outrage he has, then explain how a happy outcome might have been arranged.”
But Freud and Spock failed to anticipate one problem. Some people refuse to reason and see no happy outcome outside of getting their way. In fact, according to Freud, there is no acceptable outcome for these gays short of certain non-gays changing their values.
Hence the politics of intimidation and aggression with no terminus to gay demands nor any possibility of sober discussion.
This article first appeared in Salvo 8, Spring 2009.
- Gay Marriage Rage by Maggie Gallagher
- LOS(T) ANGELES: Homosexuals sodomize image of Jesus Christ from La Voz De Aztlan.
- The Tyranny of the Minority by S. T. Karnick. “Favoring government-enforced recognition of same-sex “marriage” is not, as the media invariably characterize it, a kindly, liberal-minded position, but instead a fierce, coercive, intolerant one.”
- Thirteen Bad Arguments for Same-Sex Marriage from Christianity Today
- Answering Christian Arguments for Gay “Marriage” by Regis Nicoll. “Playing fast and loose with the homophobia card … is a sure sign of desperation. When you can’t advance your position through rational discourse, you play the victim of misanthropes targeting you for the endangered list.”
- Same Sex, Different Marriage by Mollie Ziegler Hamingway. “The New York Times, of all papers, argues that gay unions could significantly alter marriage norms.”
- Protecting Marriage to Protect Children by David Blankenhorn. “I’m a liberal Democrat. And I do not favor same-sex marriage.”